Can U.K. be Described as a Homogeneous Society Essay

Can U.K. be Described as a Homogeneous Society - Essay ExampleThe rise of industrialization, with its drawing of people into slums in bigger towns and cities contributed to a new set of cultural distinctions based on class, and in turn on politics, with the appendage of Labour and Tory ideologies with their focus on the interests of working and middle classes respectively. These distinctions choose been eroded, somewhat, with the rise of New Labour, and the dilemmas that either go capitalists states face when expansion no longer seems achievable or even appropriate. Class distinctions have shifted from the defining domain of work, to that of popular culture. The media feed multiple new sub-cultures, based on tastes in clothes, music, lifestyle, entertainment etcetera The influence on the media on culture is, however , not without its problems. One effect is to cater for a highly commercialised product which is targeted at maximum coverage. This is so much commercial output is commodified to the gunpoint where it appears unoriginal. Recent empirical investigations of the actual perceptions of people in all regions of the UK, as opposed to popular myths suggest, however, that old-fashioned assumptions about such distinctions as race and class may no longer hold in quite the port that people imagine. The idea, much vaunted by some, that the political culture in Scotland is fundamentally dissimilar than in England, for example, has turned out not to be well founded in fact despite all the very plausible reasons why Scots should be different, our comprehensive comparisons suggested far more similarity than rest between those who live in Scotland and those who live in the rest of Britain. (Miller et al., 1996, p. 369) The strands of culture that divide people argon no longer based so much upon indigenous peoples, but along grounds of class, politics, gender, theology and any number of other features. In his interesting analysis of the way government and politics have developed in Britain, John Kingdom traces the countrys journey in the last snow years or so from being a force of world capitalism, governing an empire consisting of galore(postnominal) colonies in far corners of the world, to its present mail as a former colonial master, still relations with the aftermath of empire, and failing to find a comfortable position in relation to the emerging consellation of powers on the European mainland. Concepts such as the once splendid sceptered isle (Kingdom, 2004, p. 87) and the Rule Britannia complacency of front ages no longer apply in a world which is increasingly inter-connected. The process of globalisation changes the way that people relate to both space and time, bringing distant matters close, and speeding up all the chat and trading processes that underpin the world economy. John Kingdom points out that the United Kingdom can no longer take for granted a privileged position as driver of these changes, and is now entran ceway into a period of decline. The geographical island situation which was once interpreted as a distinctive and exalting feature, becomes something much more akin to isolation or even exclusion, as the British Prime rector recently discovered during European finance negotiations. In an entirely different domain, the transition from a position of dealing with