Three Criteria Of A Good Political Leader Politics Essay

Three Criteria Of A Good semipolitical Leader Politics EssayIn political science and history, there be terce criteria used to determine what makes for a great, trade good or a successful political filler. The three criteria are responding to crisis, utilizing the office for leadership and good universe policies. Responding to crisis, which fuel likewise be termed as crisis management, is a process that deals with responding to an events that threaten to harm a society or instalment where unmatched(a) is in charge. In a crisis, there is unremarkably a cause of threat or insecurity that happens abruptly and impulsively and requires a short time to make a decision and there is usu eachy need for change since the old system seemed to have digped. in that location are various types of crisis that can hit a nation or a constituent and these include Natural disasters which is considered an act of God, and occurs in the forms of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tornadoes, hur ricanes, floods, droughts, storms and tsunami. at that place is also confrontation crisis which occurs when an unhappy group of people fight the regimen to gain acceptance of their expectations. It takes the form of boycotts, strikes, and issuance of ultimatum to an office occupant. Other forms of crisis that can cause disturbance in a society include technological crisis, crisis of malevolence and rumors.As a chair of a nation, the reception one give to a crisis really matters. It is a measure of how much the prexy cares for his or her subjects. It is grave for the professorship to always give a education or be there in person in response to either sort of crisis.The second criteria involves utilizing the office for leadership. Leadership is a complaisant influence where one requires the support of new(prenominal)s to accomplish a common goal. This goal, mess or dream is suppose to bring change to the people macrocosm governed and it is not to be self centered or have any form of selfish participation for the leader. As a political leader, the of import focus of ones vision should be the common civilian and tax payers who entrusts one and gives them the mandate to guide them and lead them.The office of leadership should be tempered with honor, respect and integrity and should not be used to enrich oneself by fleasing money.The third and last criteria is good public policies. Public policies entails a pass of action or a position taken by the leadership of government concerning a specific publishing. These issues may range from global issues to issues of assert interest. For instance, matters concerning global warming and the environment are very crucial and it is important for a government or the head of government to come up with policies handling this issue pretty well.Apart from George Washington, Abraham capital of Nebraska, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, there were also other prexys in the US that were considered great, go od and successful since they measured up to the three criteria demonstrateed above of a good leader of a nation. Andrew Jackson, the seventh chairman of the US got into indicant with such force that a time terminus was named after him. He brought to an end years of what many Americans including himself, considered to be an elitist government. He was known to have engaged the people in matters of national interest and made them be like the administrator branch in the process. in the beginning him, president seemed to be working with the congress so as to number the national agenda. Jackson was against the issue of having a big government, and he disliked debt. These two issues that are mainly accredited to Jackson, made him the only American president to clearly off all national debt. During his tenure, he ejected all the Indians living east of the Mississippi what is now called Oklahoma. This resulted into the Indian Removal work appear of 1830. He eventually placed the mil lions of acres that became free for development. Though he was not all round perfect, but his policies had a common good for the American civilian.Another example of a successful American president is James Knox Polk. His biggest accomplishment was when he acquired the introduce of Texas, the second largest land in America. When he came into power, Texas became part of the union of states and this increased the boundaries of America to the Rio Grande. He was also able to reduce tariffs and he established treasury systems that are independent. He was able to achieve everything he wanted in one term. He utilized well the office for leadership and he had good public policies.Among the least successful and weak presidents of the US and who did not measure up to these three criteria is James Buchanan. He had bad public policies that were racial in nature and particularly discriminated on people of African decent. He was caught stating that thraldom was an issue of little practical impo rtance. Whether or not they were slaves, blacks could never be citizens of th US and the congress had no authority to prohibit thralldom in federal territories.Millard Fillto a greater extent, is also considered one of the worst presidents of the US because of his policies and flair of leadership that saw him sign into law the Fugitive Slavery work on that sought to force the authorities in free states to return fleer slaves to their masters. He got into power after the death of President Taylor and changed Taylors entire console table with individuals known to be favorable to the compromise efforts.Question 2Taft was for the raft of a limited presidential powers. And he said, the true view of the executive functions is, as I conceive it, that the president can exercise no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific cave in of power or unslopedly implied and included within such chatter naming as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific g rant must be either in the federal administration or in an act of Congress passed in pursuance thereof.. While on the other hand, Theodore Roosevelt, was for the view of stretching presidential powers to affect other nations that were in general depending on the US for support. He is said to be the foundation for the repeat join States intervention in the governing of countries in, or bordering on, the Caribbean. Roosevelts scope for presidential powers was suppose to stretch to bordering and other countries. This policy is seen to have taken gist currently. The position of the president of the United States of America on any issue is highly sort for and also influences other nations greatly. Roosevelt also believed in presidential prerogative power, the ability to do anything not prohibited by the Constitution or statute.Of the presidents cited in question 1 above, James Buchanan would be more likely to side with president Roosevelt view of a stretched presidential power to ot her nations. While president James Knox would appear to agree with president Taft for a limited presidential power.Question 3President Abraham Lincoln viewed that the presidential powers are not limited by the constitution in cases that require quick and decisive measures. He is highly accredited for the American Civil War that brought freedom to many slaves in the US. Using the clause of the constitution that makes him Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, he made use of these powers to go out of the constitution. He argued that this clause gave him the right to do any(prenominal) he wants and whatever is right bring down the enemy. Most of the orders he issued to the Army and state militia was done without the consent of the congress. Before the congress could convene and discuss the way forward, the army was already on a mission to sail through an assignment. He allocated money for the federal government before e ngaging in any consultation with the congress. And all these ha did with the justification of the clause in the constitution that made him commander in chief of the Armed Forces.There are various circumstances that can cause a president to act unconstitutional at the same the actions be justified just like in the case of Abraham Lincoln. When it is necessary for the president to make snap and quick decision like concerning a war then the overlook of law can be disregarded. However such actions may lead to unforeseen problems that may eventually manifest in the future.